Paris Olympics 2024- Is Olympic boxing scoring system Fair or flawed?
Olympic Boxing Scoring Under Fire After Controversial Defeat of India’s Nishant Dev
New Delhi: The complex and opaque scoring system in Olympic boxing has once again come under scrutiny following India’s Nishant Dev’s controversial loss to Mexico’s Marco Verde Alvarez in the 71 kg quarter-final. Despite appearing to dominate the bout, Dev lost with a score of 1-4, sparking renewed debates over the fairness and transparency of boxing’s scoring system—a subject that has been contentious with each Olympic Games.
An Uncertain Future for Olympic Boxing
The ongoing controversies surrounding the scoring system could have significant implications for the sport’s inclusion in the Los Angeles 2028 Olympics. As scrutiny intensifies, there is growing concern that the current system could prove detrimental to boxing’s future in the Olympic Games.
Voices of Frustration
Former Indian boxer and 2008 Olympic bronze medallist Vijender Singh expressed his frustration on social media following Dev’s defeat. “I don’t know what’s the scoring system but I think very close fight..he play so well..koi na bhai,” Singh posted on X. This sentiment is shared by many in the boxing community, who feel the scoring system lacks clarity and consistency.
Historical Context of Controversial Decisions
The controversy surrounding Olympic boxing scoring is not a new phenomenon. One of the most notable instances was Michael Conlan’s loss in the 2016 Rio quarter-finals. Conlan, feeling “robbed” after the bout, had a famous expletive-laden tirade against the judges. He turned professional soon after and has remained vocal about the flaws in the amateur scoring system. Commenting on the ongoing Games in Paris, Conlan reiterated his criticism of the system.
Mary Kom’s Disappointment
India’s iconic boxer, MC Mary Kom, also faced a similar situation in the Tokyo 2020 Games. Despite leading in terms of rounds won, she lost her pre-quarterfinal bout against Colombia’s Ingrit Valencia due to the overall scoreline favoring her opponent. Expressing her frustration, Mary Kom stated, “The worst part is that there is no review or protest,” highlighting another critical flaw in the current system.
Decades of Discontent
Controversial decisions in Olympic boxing date back decades. In the 1988 Seoul Olympics, American boxer Roy Jones Jr. was controversially denied a gold medal despite dominating his bout against South Korea’s Park Si-Hun. The outcry from this decision led to the introduction of computer scoring in the 1992 Barcelona Games, intended to reduce human error in judging. However, this system faced criticism for encouraging defensive boxing and limiting the variety of punches.
Introduction of the 10-Point Scoring System
In 2013, the International Boxing Association (AIBA) adopted a professional-style 10-point scoring system. This system introduced subjectivity by considering defensive prowess, ring control, and overall aggression. Criticism of this system resurfaced during the 2016 Rio Olympics when Michael Conlan publicly denounced the judges after his controversial loss.
Revelations of Corruption
An investigation commissioned by AIBA in 2021 revealed a system for manipulating results at the Rio Games, which led to the suspension of 36 judges. The names of these judges were never disclosed, continuing the opacity surrounding the scoring system in Olympic boxing.
Call for Reform
Given these ongoing issues, the future of boxing in the Olympics hangs in the balance. The sport’s stakeholders must address the systemic problems in the scoring process to restore credibility and ensure fair competition. Nishant Dev’s experience in Paris is a stark reminder of the urgent need for transparency and reform in Olympic boxing.
Conclusion
The recent controversy surrounding Nishant Dev’s loss has once again highlighted the critical issues plaguing Olympic boxing’s scoring system. As the sport’s inclusion in future Olympic Games becomes increasingly uncertain, there is an urgent need for stakeholders to implement reforms that will restore credibility and ensure fair play. Without significant changes, boxing risks being sidelined from the Olympics, a fate that would be a significant loss for athletes and fans alike.
Also Read: Amit Panghal’s Olympic campaign ends with loss to Chinyemba
Wonderful web site Lots of useful info here Im sending it to a few friends ans additionally sharing in delicious And obviously thanks to your effort
Eu li algumas coisas excelentes aqui Definitivamente vale a pena marcar como favorito para revisitar Eu me pergunto quanto esforço você fez para fazer esse tipo de site informativo excelente
Your blog is a true gem in the world of online content. I’m continually impressed by the depth of your research and the clarity of your writing. Thank you for sharing your wisdom with us.
Hi my loved one I wish to say that this post is amazing nice written and include approximately all vital infos Id like to peer more posts like this